There is no match here, the big winner is Val d'Isère

rabiislamh2

It has the advantage of leaving more room for the design world that surrounds it. Montserrat pairs well with serif fonts, such as Playfair Display or Oswald. 6.3: Mobile compatibility For Google, the site is responsive or is Google Mobile Friendly. Note that there is not yet a downloadable application from the App Store or Android Market. User experience (UX) comparison In terms of color symbolism: The 3 sites respect the symbolism of the colors which have the same positive connotations and the same sector of activity: nature, leisure, tourism. A little "-" for the fade of the large photos on.

Valdisere.com "from Airbnb", because by changing the image each time, it will change WhatsApp Number List the universe and therefore the brain of the visitor to the site will have to make summaries complex. In terms of speed of display time The “ Courchevel ” home page has: A global our of F. A full page display time of 10 seconds. Has a total weight of 13.3 Mb, including 12.7 Mb of images. Generates 104 queries. The “ Megève ” home page has: A global our of C. A complete page display time of 9.6 seconds. Has a total weight of 31.4 Mb, including 30.6 Mb of videos. Generates 56 queries. The “ Val d’Isère ” home page has: A global our of D.





A complete page view time of 6.9 seconds. Has a total weight of 9.50 Mb, including 8.83 Kb of images. Generates 82 queries.  It is absolutely necessary to work on the weight of the images or videos for Courchevel or Megève. In terms of design/graphics/ergonomics The 3 sites are beautiful and respect UI standards. The typographies of the 3 sites are for: The texts in Sans Serif (sans serif), respectively in the order of the analyzed sites “Helvetica Neue”, “Aktiv Grotesk” and “Montserrat”. The texts in serif (with serif) for Megeve and Val d'Isère, respectively "Lust" and "Playfair Display". The most attractive site is Megève, because it is clear and uncluttered at the same time.